Why All The Un Vehicles In Us?

[Nambo]

Just been looking on the net at the pictures of fields full of thousands of United Nations vehicles being stockpiled in America.
Been looking at the pictures of more United Nations vehicles arriving into America at the ports.
Been reading about buses in America being painted in United Nations colours.

I thought UN vehicles where used in Africa etc to keep the peace in war torn countries?

Whats going on over there guys?

[Sketch]

Hey Nambo,

do you have a location, website or more info on the where, what, and so on??

[Nambo]

Hey Nambo,

do you have a location, website or more info on the where, what, and so on??[/b]http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72/Nambocttr/UNcars1_orig.jpg

I will PM you the link Sketch.

[Berean]

I googled it, and that was in 1999, apparently?

[Jeshurun]

I googled it, and that was in 1999, apparently?[/b]

Yeah, probably within a few days after Bush got elected. And I thought Clinton was bad.

Just think though, thousands of years of all this planning, and killing, and lying, and scheming, and deceiving, and really hard work. And what exactly do they get out of it? A chance to steer the ship for 42 months, and then, like a Michael Jordan layup.....swishhhhhh. Buzzer! Time Expired! Toodles! See ya in the fiery lake! Don't forget your toothbrush! Hope ya had fun! Don't let the door hit ya on the way down! We'll throw all these buses down there with ya too, we dont need em.....Oh, you forgot your microchips!

:applaudit: :applaudit: :applaudit:

Oops, just realized 2000 was the election year...well it doesn't matter because Bush doesn't call the shots anyway...

Nambo, did the elite cause that big wind in London yesterday?

Because I was just reading an article about how they've developed climate control technology, where if they were able to diffuse enough cloud cover in just the right spots, they could create a cat-5 hurricane and steer it where they want to....

Hmmm.

[Nambo]

I googled it, and that was in 1999, apparently?[/b]

Saw that myself, maybe they are waiting for Haliburton to complete all the concentration camps before they use the vehicles to round us up in?
Or maybe they keep getting delays in thier time-frame?

Jeshurun, I dont think the Elite caused the winds in London yesterday, I think it was a warm front meeting a cold front or something.

Having said that, I did notice a lot of cris-cross chemtrails over London a few days before, now thats a whole new theory!

It just doesnt stop!

Thank goodness I ride a BSA

[olrono]

<div class='quotemain'>I googled it, and that was in 1999, apparently?[/b]

Saw that myself, maybe they are waiting for Haliburton to complete all the concentration camps before they use the vehicles to round us up in?
Or maybe they keep getting delays in thier time-frame?

Jeshurun, I dont think the Elite caused the winds in London yesterday, I think it was a warm front meeting a cold front or something.

Having said that, I did notice a lot of cris-cross chemtrails over London a few days before, now thats a whole new theory!

It just doesnt stop!

Thank goodness I ride a BSA
[/b][/quote]


You know brothers, in the 90&#39;s we learned of the HARP project in Alaska. Maybe you can google it still?

[Jeshurun]

You know brothers, in the 90&#39;s we learned of the HARP project in Alaska. Maybe you can google it still?[/b]

You can google anything, Ron. Just make sure you spell it HAARP. It&#39;s the most evil thing they&#39;ve come up with yet.

[Nambo]

I havnt been able to find anything more recent on the UN vehicles Iam afraid, so maybe it was just a bit of disinformation, but having said that, there are a couple of sources from as recent as last September that show concern at the many foriegn UN troops that are on American soil.

I also read a theory that another 911 false flag terrorist event triggers laws that Bush has implemented without even the backing of congress, and resulting in Martial Law being policed by the United Nations, and especially whilst the American Millitary are tied up in the Middle East.

Maybe they where expecting it to kick off in a much bigger way after 911 than it did?

[Jeshurun]

Maybe they where expecting it to kick off in a much bigger way after 911 than it did?[/b]

Flight 93 was supposed to hit the Capitol, and the air commander of North Dakota acted on his own in shooting it down. That much is evident from the fact that the plane&#39;s debris was spread over an 8 mile area, and the big hole in Shanksville that they dug up was merely planted evidence. It doesn&#39;t seem that any of the debris ended up there.

If it had hit the Capitol as planned, the emergency ordinance would have been martial law.

One has to wonder if the plane being shot down had anything to do with divine intervention.

Lou

[Shibboleth]

<div class='quotemain'>Maybe they where expecting it to kick off in a much bigger way after 911 than it did?[/b]

Flight 93 was supposed to hit the Capitol, and the air commander of North Dakota acted on his own in shooting it down. That much is evident from the fact that the plane&#39;s debris was spread over an 8 mile area, and the big hole in Shanksville that they dug up was merely planted evidence. It doesn&#39;t seem that any of the debris ended up there.

If it had hit the Capitol as planned, the emergency ordinance would have been martial law.

One has to wonder if the plane being shot down had anything to do with divine intervention.

Lou
[/b][/quote]

You need to post a link to that because that sounds like more conspiracy mumbo jumbo. If you are gonna make posts of stuff you heard please make sure to back up your findings with facts. The facts I have seen relating to this event have been that the plane went down in a rapid descent. almost like the plane was pointing straight down when it crashed. I heard of no military plane intervention.

Regards,

Shibboleth

[Jeshurun]

You need to post a link to that because that sounds like more conspiracy mumbo jumbo. If you are gonna make posts of stuff you heard please make sure to back up your findings with facts. The facts I have seen relating to this event have been that the plane went down in a rapid descent. almost like the plane was pointing straight down when it crashed. I heard of no military plane intervention.

Regards,

Shibboleth[/b]

We can start with this excerpt from an interview between Alex Jones, and Col. Donn de Grand Pre, a retired US Army Colonel and a former mideast arms dealer under the Carter and Reagan Administrations:


<span style="font-family:Arial">John: And was United Airlines Flight 93 shot down in Pennsylvania by a U.S. or NATO pilot and was that what was supposed to hit the Pentagon?

DGP: No, that was hit at 10:00 hours. It was taken out by the North Dakota Air Guard. I know the pilot who fired those two missiles to take down 93.

John: Was it shot down because the airline pilots actually regained control of the hijacked auto-pilot or was that to replace the unmanned drone that was shot down?

DGP: No, it was the aircraft, you see, had totally unconscious people on board. There were no hijackers. At 9:35, the Happy Hooligans, the Air Guard flying the F-16s were ordered to take that plane out. And they took it out from 9:35 to 10:00.

John: Were there any refueling jets involved in that operation?

AJ: Hold on a second, John. The question is why would they deviate from the plan of flying it into the Capitol? Why did the globalists decide to go ahead and shoot the plane down?

DGP: There had been an adjustment to the controls, probably by an AWACs aircraft flying overhead, again, remote control. And it was on a course for either the Capitol or the White House. And at this stage, you don&#39;t know. The Happy Hooligans came in and took care of it.

AJ: Do you think they were not following orders?

DGP: Who, the Happy Hooligans?

AJ: Well, yeah, you&#39;ve got Cheney running around, we&#39;ve got the stand down taking place.

DGP: Well, this is correct, but you see the Adj. General of the State of North Dakota gave the command to take it out. And, by God, they took it out. And I&#39;ve got the full story in the book.

AJ: That&#39;s a good thing they did that. You said you talked to the pilot. Think about this folks. Imagine what Bush would have gotten if he would have had that plane fly into the Capitol? Imagine the police state we would be in right now.

DGP: Yes, yes, yes, indeed.

AJ: And so you had to have the diversionary blast at the Pentagon so no one would get suspicious and think it was a military coup.

DGP: Perhaps, perhaps.

AJ: John, does that answer your question?

John: Was there any refueling tankers used by the North Dakota Air Guard and what tanker wing was used?

DGP: I don&#39;t know about the aircraft itself. I don&#39;t know about refueling. They came off base in Langley and it was just a few minutes out from Langley to the intercept over Pennsylvania. It was just a matter of minutes.

AJ: Colonel, how did you get in touch with the pilot who shot the plane down?

DGP: It turned out to be an old friend of mine from the Air National Guard and this is my home state of North Dakota. And I attended the ceremony in North Dakota and watched the Adj. General [garbled] the pilot being decorated a year later for this activity that happened on 911 with Flight 93.
<span style="color:#000000">
AJ: Colonel, before we take these four final calls, go over that a little bit slower for folks. That&#39;s a big deal. You talked to the pilot, a friend of yours, who shot down Flight 93 that was going for the Capitol or the White House. And go over that for folks.

DGP: Okay, quick rundown. They were out of Hector Field, Fargo, North Dakota. A bunch, this 119 Fighter Group and they are called the Happy Hooligans. They are probably the best interceptors that we have in the country. They were moved to Langley Air Force Base from Hector Field down to Southern Virginia. And when the klaxon horn went off at 9:35, those two pilots put down their coffee and shot into their aircraft and took off. They didn&#39;t know where they were going initially but by 10:00 hours, they had rendezvoused over Southern Pennsylvania. That&#39;s about 250 miles in just a matter of minutes and engaged 93 with two side-winder missiles. And they accomplished their objective. Now Hector Field, I use to fly out of Hector Field some time ago. I know most of those pilots. I could name names. I know the National Guard Adj. General. And they were decorated about a year later and I have the full write up of that story in my book.

AJ: Yeah and it&#39;s just ignored by the media. I have that article, too. And later, well okay, it was a missile, well there wasn&#39;t "Let&#39;s Roll." It&#39;s all made-up theatre for the public and we buy it like a bunch of saps.

DGP: That is correct.
</span>

</span>
I&#39;ve seen the film clip of the ceremony he&#39;s speaking of here, I believe Rumsfeld gave out the award, or he spoke there. I can research it if you want. Funny how it never made it to the mainstream news...
If you&#39;d like a link to the article please PM me.

Lou

[Shibboleth]

Jeshurun, not that I don&#39;t take your word for it, but could you send me the link.

Thanks,

Shibboleth

[Nambo]

Shibboleth,
Of course the article Jeshurun could be construed as somebody telling tall tails, so, to back it up, see if you can google the many accounts of witnesses who saw the plane being shot down in the sky.

Ask yourself, if an airplane dives into ground which is so soft that it just disappears, how come parts of the wreckage is found 8 miles away?

I will repeat that for emphisis, how come some of the wreckage is found spread over 8 miles?

There is a new site out called Pilots for 911 truth.
Now maybe these fellas are just "Mumbo Jumbo" as well but:-
Now these guys are experts in flying, and air traffic control and various emergency in flight proceedures.
The reason they set the site up is because they cannot understand how somebody who could not fly a Cesna in a straight line, could supposedly perform manuvers in a 737 that the proffessional pilots themselves would have trouble with.

The do an interesting documentary where they show the flight plan from the Pentagon black box, and compare it to the official "story" flight plan.

Heres something they posted about the flight 93 "crash"

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y72/Nambocttr/UA93FDR3.jpg

[Berean]

Could it be that a mid-air explosion occurred due to technical difficulties, but not necessarily because the plane was shot down?

[Nambo]

Could it be that a mid-air explosion occurred due to technical difficulties, but not necessarily because the plane was shot down?[/b]

Could be?, but why lie about it?
And why dig that big hole?
One of the pictures of that hole just after the "crash" shows tall grasses allready coming through that must grow incredebly quickly.
Maybe one of you guys over there can get one of those underground x-ray imaging things and see if you can see an airplane underground.

That ground must have been soft as snow for the airplane to just disappear like that, supprised the investigators can even stand on it!
Generally even when a plane hits water it breaks up scattering bits around.

Dont let the feds catch you though else you will be in an orange suit with no trial.