Global Warming

[James]

....or to be more accurate, Climate Change.

Here is a link to NASA's (http://climate.nasa.gov/) vital signs of the planet.
128

129

130

131

agape,
James

[FutureMan]

Hello James, I do not trust NASA as a reliable source of information, in my opinion NASA is a propaganda machine and they only tell you, what they want you to know.

[mrgalleria]

Alo ha,
James, these reports from NASA could also indicate
the effects the planet has suffered from- because of
atomic and nuclear bomb tests, as well as accident's like Chernobyl.
There is a prophet who say's the Wormwood in Revelation
is this hot, long-lived atomic pollution. He is stranger than I (I know, hard to believe),
and uses some profanity, but you are welcome to hear his message-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSq-POG7fYc
Bill

[uglyandthin]

Alo ha,
James, these reports from NASA could also indicate
the effects the planet has suffered from- because of
atomic and nuclear bomb tests, as well as accident's like Chernobyl.
There is a prophet who say's the Wormwood in Revelation
is this hot, long-lived atomic pollution. He is stranger than I (I know, hard to believe),
and uses some profanity, but you are welcome to hear his message-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSq-POG7fYc
Bill

Hi Bill and James:

Here is a link to a very reliable sourse that shows otherwise to the original charts in this thread (not your point Bill). A study over the past Century up to 1987 that show no heating or cooling of any statistically significant trend. The head of the U.N. council on global warming, Jones, I think his name is from east anglia university in England recently admitted in an interview with the BBC that there has not been any statistically significant warming of the globe since 1995. This of course is when the evidence has not been tampered with and none has been left out. The following link is from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

http://www.nytimes.com/1989/01/26/us/us-data-since-1895-fail-to-show-warming-trend.html?pagewanted=1

uglyandthin

[Gilligan]

Alo ha,
James, these reports from NASA could also indicate
the effects the planet has suffered from- because of
atomic and nuclear bomb tests, as well as accident's like Chernobyl.
There is a prophet who say's the Wormwood in Revelation
is this hot, long-lived atomic pollution. He is stranger than I (I know, hard to believe),
and uses some profanity, but you are welcome to hear his message-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSq-POG7fYc
Bill

Totally Radical stuff Billy,
You hang in there okey dokey,,,,

[uglyandthin]

Alo ha,
James, these reports from NASA could also indicate
the effects the planet has suffered from- because of
atomic and nuclear bomb tests, as well as accident's like Chernobyl.
There is a prophet who say's the Wormwood in Revelation
is this hot, long-lived atomic pollution. He is stranger than I (I know, hard to believe),
and uses some profanity, but you are welcome to hear his message-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSq-POG7fYc
Bill

Hi Bill:

I think he believes that, but do you? No offence to him meant but that didn't make any sense at all. It was neither simple, nor convincing. Just my opinion.

uglyandthin

[mrgalleria]

Well, we know all that atomic waste went up into the air,
and it covered the planet, and it does not degrade quickly, so what happened to it?
It still has to be around.
The idea that the ice melting, spilling into the ocean,
and that massive weight pushing down on the seafloor
causing it to depress, makes some sense too.
I can not ignore his reasoning.
Bill

[mrgalleria]

Radioactive Fallout

"The gift that keeps on giving."
That phrase is one way of describing radioactive fallout. Radioactive fallout is material produced by the explosion of a nuclear weapon or by a nuclear reactor accident. This material is blown into the atmosphere and then falls back to Earth over an extended period of time.
Radioactive fallout was an especially serious problem for about 20 years after the first atomic bombs were dropped in 1945. The United States and the former Soviet Union tested hundreds of nuclear weapons in the atmosphere. Each time one of these weapons was tested, huge amounts of radioactive materials were released to the atmosphere. They were then carried around the globe by the atmosphere's prevailing winds. Over long periods of time, they were carried back to Earth's surface or settled to the ground on their own (because of their weight).
More than 60 different kinds of radioactive materials are formed during the explosion of a typical nuclear weapon. Some of these decay and become harmless in a matter of minutes, hours, or days. Other remain radioactive for many years.
An example of a long-lived radioactive material is strontium-90. Strontium-90 loses one-half of its radioactivity every 28 years. It can continue to pose a threat, therefore, for more than a century. The special problem presented by strontium-90 is that it behaves very much like another element—calcium. When it falls to Earth, it is taken up by grass, leaves, and other plant parts. When cows eat grass, they take in strontium-90. The strontium-90 is incorporated into their milk, which is then taken in by humans. Once in the human body, strontium-90 is incorporated into bones and teeth in much the same way that calcium is. Children growing up in the 1960s may still have low levels of strontium-90 in their systems—a "long-lasting gift" from the makers of nuclear weapons.



Read more: Nuclear Weapons - humans, body, used, water, Earth, life, chemical, form, energy, reaction, gas, animals, air, parts, effects, cause, primary, plant, waves (http://www.scienceclarified.com/Mu-Oi/Nuclear-Weapons.html#ixzz0giuqoyEH) http://www.scienceclarified.com/Mu-Oi/Nuclear-Weapons.html#ixzz0giuqoyEH

[Jinnvisible]

Some of the big corporations and government really do abuse the environment.

I probably do to, in a smaller way. Such as breathing out. The carbon emmision of life.

...and lo Adam was given the 'carbon emission' of life. (bible misquote)

Global warming has been hijacked due to the possibilities it presents in forcing a world wide legal president. As soon as the nations make one global law they have the hook to hang the global government upon.

There are other problems though. As far as I know the greenie meanies aren’t behind urban asthma attacks. My sister who is a few years older than me was a chronic asthmatic. It really used to disturb me as a nipper watching her gasping to breath.

They also had this pump that they used to put on her to clear her airways which she hated. When I was four I tried to stick it up the U bend in the toilet bowl. Apparently they caught me red handed.

The poisoning of rivers ECT.

As for oil pollution from vehicles, carbon emissions that issue is also multi faceted.
For instance you got people like Larouche and lord Monkton who are exposing some of the trickery in the environmental populism. However Larouche doesn’t really want an oil based economy either for almost entirely other reasons. Unnecessary Asian land wars being one of them. If these shady world characters are prepared to cook up evidence to go to war for the purpose of controlling fossil based energy resources then they would certainly be prepared to influence the scientific community. A world community of science that basically accepts and promotes Darwinism.

Then there are the oil energy chiefs such as…. Oh yeah…. The Bush family and the Bin Ladens.

I’m sure those families have some nice people in them but Isn’t it Big Oil that has had a hand in suppressing the advancement of all of these brilliant alternative energy systems ?

Its hard to imagine but at one time 220V / 240V electricity was a ‘wacky alternative new energy’.

There was actually a film documentary made about the takeover of the Greenpeace org. It got politicized and corperatized in the late 1970’s / early 1980’s. I saw it, It’s like a lot of these big UN NGO’s. They probably have people in them who do good things and will even perhaps come out of them before the new world order beast starts roll call.

[mrgalleria]

Alo ha,
Quote- "Its hard to imagine but at one time 220V / 240V electricity was a ‘wacky alternative new energy’."

I think you mean AC current, as in alternating current, invented by Tesla. Westinghouse was dead set against it, or was it Edison, I forgot. It was so long ago, and I was young then (or that is what my kids would have you believe).

Quote- "My sister who is a few years older than me was a chronic asthmatic"

I don't know if this was mentioned before, but in 1970, lung disease was the #10 cause of death, yet this year it is expected to be #1. Strange, with improved auto emissions, low emission fuels, and smoking laws which decrease 2nd hand smoking effects as well as causing many to quit smoking.
Bill