PDA

View Full Version : Abaddon/apollyon - Christ Or Other?



Shibboleth
01-12-2007, 04:20 PM
I have researched the topic of Abaddon/Apollyon and if this is really Jesus Christ or another being namely Satan. The reason why I have done research is not to discount the Watchtower Society's research or conclusions, but to see why the Watchtower is the only one that views Abaddon/Apollyon as Christ where everyone else sees something more evil and in many cases believe it to be Satan and his demon hordes. I will quote scripture and try my hardest to remember what the Climax book and other materials say about this subject so I can give a clean biased view.

Let's start at the end of the 4th trumpet.



Rev. 8

13 (http://) And I saw, and I heard an eagle flying in midheaven say with a loud voice: “Woe, woe, woe to those dwelling on the earth because of the rest of the trumpet blasts of the three angels who are about to blow their trumpets!”[/b]


This proclamation was heard after the 4th trumpet. Three woes for the last three trumpets. These woes are for the entire earth not just a select few but the whole world that includes you and me. The other time that Revelation calls a woe for the earth is when Satan is cast to the earth.



Rev. 12

12 (http://) On this account be glad, YOU heavens and YOU who reside in them! Woe for the earth and for the sea, because the Devil has come down to YOU, having great anger, knowing he has a short period of time.”[/b]

So this was a woe being proclaimed for the earth and for the sea. The sea would represent the sea of mankind. We are part of the sea of mankind. So how does it tie into the three woes that are proclaimed in the last three trumpet blasts? I see this woe and the three woes as one and the same. I see the three trumpet blasts that are woes to mankind as being the time when Satan is unleashed on the earth.

The 5th trumpet blast.



Rev. 9

1 (http://) And the fifth angel blew his trumpet. And I saw a star that had fallen from heaven to the earth, and the key of the pit of the abyss was given him. 2 (http://) And he opened the pit of the abyss, and smoke ascended out of the pit as the smoke of a great furnace, and the sun was darkened, also the air, by the smoke of the pit.[/b]

The Watchtower Society sees this angel that falls to the earth with the key to the abyss as Jesus. I see and understand their reasoning on why they came to this conclusion and I agree with them, but the part I have a problem with is "And I saw a star that had fallen from heaven to earth". The word fallen has always been associated with someone who has been terminated from a positions. For instance "Babylon the Great has fallen." means that a great empire has been taken out of commision, it no longer holds the power it once had.



Rev. 9

3 And out of the smoke locusts came forth upon the earth; and authority was given them, the same authority as the scorpions of the earth have. 4 (http://) And they were told to harm no vegetation of the earth nor any green thing nor any tree, but only those men who do not have the seal of God on their foreheads.

5 (http://) And it was granted the [locusts], not to kill them, but that these should be tormented five months, and the torment upon them was as torment by a scorpion when it strikes a man. 6 (http://) And in those days the men will seek death but will by no means find it, and they will desire to die but death keeps fleeing from them.[/b]

The Climax book describes these locusts as an army doing the preaching work. I do not have the actual quote from the Climax book so if anyone would like, please post it so we can go over it in more detail. Now the reason why I do not think this has anything to do with witnessing or preaching is the way that it is worded. The locust army was not to hurt anyone who had the seal of God on their foreheads. Those with the seal are the annointed class. So how could a command be given to the Annointed class (if they are the locusts) not to harm themselves. The preaching work in my opinion is not a woe, but I believe it is a blessing. No, there is something more to these locusts. Why would the preaching work drive people to want to die? I believe these locusts are in fact demons.



Rev. 9

7 (http://) And the likenesses of the locusts resembled horses prepared for battle; and upon their heads [were] what seemed to be crowns like gold, and their faces [were] as men’s faces, 8 (http://) but they had hair as women’s hair. And their teeth were as those of lions; 9 (http://) and they had breastplates like iron breastplates. And the sound of their wings [was] as the sound of chariots of many horses running into battle. 10 (http://) Also, they have tails and stings like scorpions; and in their tails is their authority to hurt the men five months.[/b]

When I read these verses I can't see why anyone would want to be described as looking like this. These locusts sound utterly disgusting and fierce. Now I believe the Society says these are the annointed because they wear something that looks like crowns. I don't believe this for one minute. The reason is everywhere else in revelation that describes the annointed there is no mistanking it. they are always describe as wearing white robes and beautiful and there is a distinction that is made that they actually wear crowns and not something that appears to be crowns. Again, they have an authority to hurt the men, that is you and me and not hurt the ones with the seals of God whom are the annointed. Would Jehovah give a command to demons to do this very thought? In actuality Jehovah doesn't command, but gives authority. Would Jehovah give authority to demons? Yes. Job is a prime example of Jehovah giving authority to Satan.



Job 1

12 (http://) Accordingly Jehovah said to Satan: “Look! Everything that he has is in your hand. Only against him himself do not thrust out your hand!” So Satan went out away from the person of Jehovah.

Job 2

6 (http://) Accordingly Jehovah said to Satan: “There he is in your hand! Only watch out for his soul itself!”[/b]

Here, Jehovah gives Satan full authority to test Job but on the condition that he doesn't kill him. So how can this mean that the locust army is the demonic forces? Satan is given authority over all the earth to test mankind. He uses all modes of influence. Also wouldn't a demonic influence drive someone to insanity moreso then someone doing the preaching work?

So how can I come to the conclusion that Abaddon/Apollyon is Satan?



Rev. 9

11 (http://) They have over them a king, the angel of the abyss. In Hebrew his name is A·bad´don, but in Greek he has the name A·pol´lyon.[/b]

Here it shows that these locusts have a king. He in fact is King of the Abyss. I can't see this being Jesus. For one, Jesus is not a King of the Abyss. He is a Heavenly installed King over the whole universe. Secondly this king is only king of the abyss which means those in the abyss are his followers. I did research on Wikipedia on this.




From Wiki



Apollyon appears in the New Testament (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Testament) (Book of Revelation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Revelation) 9:7 – 11) leading the locust-like swarm of demons (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon) that will be released in the End Times (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End_Times):

7. In appearance the locusts were like horses arrayed for battle; on their heads were what looked like crowns of gold; their faces were like human faces, 8. their hair like women's hair, and their teeth like lions' teeth; 9. they had scales like iron breastplates, and the noise of their wings was like the noise of many chariots with horses rushing into battle. 10. They have tails like scorpions, and stings, and their power of hurting men for five months lies in their tails. 11. They have as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit; his name in Hebrew is Abaddon, and in Greek he is called Apollyon. The name, in Greek (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_language) "Destroyer" (Απολλυων, from απολλυειν, to destroy) is cognate with the Hebrew Abaddon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abaddon) (lit. "place of destruction," but here personified) and the Greek god Apollo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo), also a "destroyer" in his aspect of controlling pestilence, though the composite monstrosity that is Apollyon is distinctly Babylonian and Persian, not Hellenic, in inspiration. Apollyon seems to be equated in Revelation with the Beast. The term "Apollyon" was often associated by early Christians with The Devil (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil), and fancifully described, and is still used as an alternative name for him.

Apollyon is the "foul fiend" who assaulted Christian on his pilgrimage through the Valley of Humiliation in John Bunyan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bunyan)'s great allegory The Pilgrim's Progress (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pilgrim%27s_Progress). The identification with the Asmodeus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asmodeus) of Tobit iii. 8 is erroneous.[/b]

It is interesting to note that the name Apollyon is not Hellenic but Persian/Babylonian in inspiration. So this name has deep roots in Babylonian deities. Why would Jesus be likened to a Babylonian inspired deity? or even a Greek one? I cannot see this. Also it is distinct that the angel thet falls from heaven with the keys and the angel who is King of the abyss are two different entities.


After the 5th trumpet the 6th one is blown and that is even more of a woe. That is the start of the tribulation.

Another theory is that the angel that falls to the earth is Satan and he uses the keys to open the abyssed demons that were cast into Tartarus after the flood. Which could also make sense. I am currently still doing research on that subject.


Anyways, these are some of my thoughts on why I think Abaddon/Apollyon could be someone else other then Jesus. I wrote this kinda quickly so I might have left some of my research out of the mix, but if people are willing to discuss this then I may be able to remember more. So I will open this up for discussion. If someone has information that may help me turn my views back towards the Watchtower's view on this, please post. I will not disregard any posts on this.

Thanks,

Shibboleth

Jeshurun
01-12-2007, 05:09 PM
Dear Shibboleth

Your gut feelings are absolutely correct, and the Watchtower is wrong. Because of the misinterpretations, it seemed to be the only thing that made sense to them. I just finished reading some very insightful information on this very subject, it is in the last chapter (The Revelation) of Watchman's book, Jehovah Himself Has Become King.

Lou

Berean
01-12-2007, 06:56 PM
Rev. 9

1 (http://) And the fifth angel blew his trumpet. And I saw a star that had fallen from heaven to the earth, and the key of the pit of the abyss was given him. 2 (http://) And he opened the pit of the abyss, and smoke ascended out of the pit as the smoke of a great furnace, and the sun was darkened, also the air, by the smoke of the pit.[/b]

The Watchtower Society sees this angel that falls to the earth with the key to the abyss as Jesus. I see and understand their reasoning on why they came to this conclusion and I agree with them, but the part I have a problem with is "And I saw a star that had fallen from heaven to earth". The word fallen has always been associated with someone who has been terminated from a positions. For instance "Babylon the Great has fallen." means that a great empire has been taken out of commision, it no longer holds the power it once had.[/b]
Yes, that makes sense. In fact, if you look at the very next chapter, Revelation 10:1, it speaks about an angel descending from heaven, instead of a star falling. The Greek word for 'fallen' used in Revelation 9:1 definitely has a negative connotation (of losing authority, being cast down, et cetera), whereas the Greek word for 'descending' is much more neutral.


<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE
Rev. 9

7 (http://) And the likenesses of the locusts resembled horses prepared for battle; and upon their heads [were] what seemed to be crowns like gold, and their faces [were] as men&#39;s faces, 8 (http://) but they had hair as women&#39;s hair. And their teeth were as those of lions; 9 (http://) and they had breastplates like iron breastplates. And the sound of their wings [was] as the sound of chariots of many horses running into battle. 10 (http://) Also, they have tails and stings like scorpions; and in their tails is their authority to hurt the men five months.[/b]

When I read these verses I can&#39;t see why anyone would want to be described as looking like this. These locusts sound utterly disgusting and fierce. Now I believe the Society says these are the annointed because they wear something that looks like crowns. I don&#39;t believe this for one minute. The reason is everywhere else in revelation that describes the annointed there is no mistanking it. they are always describe as wearing white robes and beautiful and there is a distinction that is made that they actually wear crowns and not something that appears to be crowns. Again, they have an authority to hurt the men, that is you and me and not hurt the ones with the seals of God whom are the annointed. Would Jehovah give a command to demons to do this very thought? In actuality Jehovah doesn&#39;t command, but gives authority. Would Jehovah give authority to demons? Yes. Job is a prime example of Jehovah giving authority to Satan.[/b][/quote]
Yes, it does resemble the situation with Job. Something that I&#39;m wondering about though is, what did John see? Did he see creatures who literally had crowns and lions&#39; teeth and so forth, as the image in the Revelation book would imply, or were the words John wrote down the best he could do to describe what he saw? In other words, did he see certain things there were not yet words for in his time? I&#39;m led to believe this could be the case, if you pay attention to how he phrased this part.

Oh, and one other thing of note: in Revelation 9, it does not explicitly state that Jehovah commands the locusts to do what they have to do. In fact, the one commanding them is not mentioned by name, and the only clue we have to identify him, as far as I can see, is that they should not harm the vegetation, only the people who do not bear the seal of God. Could this mean that all the people on Earth at that time do not bear this seal, or would that reasoning be inconsistent with the context?


<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE
Rev. 9

11 (http://) They have over them a king, the angel of the abyss. In Hebrew his name is A·bad´don, but in Greek he has the name A·pol´lyon.[/b]

Here it shows that these locusts have a king. He in fact is King of the Abyss. I can&#39;t see this being Jesus. For one, Jesus is not a King of the Abyss. He is a Heavenly installed King over the whole universe. Secondly this king is only king of the abyss which means those in the abyss are his followers. I did research on Wikipedia on this.[/b][/quote]
Well, it does not state that he is King of the Abyss, but the angel of the abyss (or, the angel of the bottomless pit). The word king could also indicate a commander. Of course I&#39;m having trouble seeing how Jesus would be a commander of those locusts.


It is interesting to note that the name Apollyon is not Hellenic but Persian/Babylonian in inspiration. So this name has deep roots in Babylonian deities. Why would Jesus be likened to a Babylonian inspired deity? or even a Greek one? I cannot see this.[/b]I must admit I have no explanation for this. From that viewpoint, it does indeed seem to indicate the Devil.


Also it is distinct that the angel thet falls from heaven with the keys and the angel who is King of the abyss are two different entities.[/b]
Yes, I agree.


Another theory is that the angel that falls to the earth is Satan and he uses the keys to open the abyssed demons that were cast into Tartarus after the flood. Which could also make sense. I am currently still doing research on that subject.[/b]
Yes, that would make sense. I think it is also in line with Jude 6, which reads &#39;And the angels that did not keep their original position but forsook their own proper dwelling place he has reserved with eternal bonds under dense darkness for the judgment of the great day.&#39; So these angels would likely be released on the great day in some way or other, if I&#39;m understanding this text correctly?

Eli&#39;s Foe
01-12-2007, 07:37 PM
Hi Shibboleth,
Interestingly this topic has also been addressed by Robert in his latest mail blog, and contrary to what has been written appears to be at variance with his view, which interestingly concurs with the Watchtower. I have posted a response to that blog based on your research, so it will be interesting to see what his take is on this. For me it appears to harmonise the prophesies of Joel with Revelation in a more satifactory manner, but let&#39;s see what he has to say!

EF

Shibboleth
01-12-2007, 07:45 PM
<div class='quotemain'>

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<div class='quotemain'>Rev. 9

11 They have over them a king, the angel of the abyss. In Hebrew his name is A·bad´don, but in Greek he has the name A·pol´lyon.[/b]

Here it shows that these locusts have a king. He in fact is King of the Abyss. I can&#39;t see this being Jesus. For one, Jesus is not a King of the Abyss. He is a Heavenly installed King over the whole universe. Secondly this king is only king of the abyss which means those in the abyss are his followers. I did research on Wikipedia on this.[/b][/quote]
Well, it does not state that he is King of the Abyss, but the angel of the abyss (or, the angel of the bottomless pit). The word king could also indicate a commander. Of course I&#39;m having trouble seeing how Jesus would be a commander of those locusts.


It is interesting to note that the name Apollyon is not Hellenic but Persian/Babylonian in inspiration. So this name has deep roots in Babylonian deities. Why would Jesus be likened to a Babylonian inspired deity? or even a Greek one? I cannot see this.[/b]I must admit I have no explanation for this. From that viewpoint, it does indeed seem to indicate the Devil.


Also it is distinct that the angel thet falls from heaven with the keys and the angel who is King of the abyss are two different entities.[/b]
Yes, I agree.


Another theory is that the angel that falls to the earth is Satan and he uses the keys to open the abyssed demons that were cast into Tartarus after the flood. Which could also make sense. I am currently still doing research on that subject.[/b]Yes, that would make sense. I think it is also in line with Jude 6, which reads &#39;And the angels that did not keep their original position but forsook their own proper dwelling place he has reserved with eternal bonds under dense darkness for the judgment of the great day.&#39; So these angels would likely be released on the great day in some way or other, if I&#39;m understanding this text correctly?[/b][/quote][/b][/quote]

Well the scripture does say the locusts have a king, but don&#39;t specifically say he is the king of the abyss but angel of the abyss. You are right that it doesn&#39;t specifically say Apollyon is King of the Abyss. He is actually king of the locusts and angel of the abyss. But I kinda see that he could also be king of the abyss since he is definitly the head angel of it.


I have read Revelation alot and I still pick new things out of it. I continued reading on to the 7th woe but I saw something different about it this time around.



Rev. 11

14 The second woe is past. Look! The third woe is coming quickly.

15 And the seventh angel blew his trumpet. And loud voices occurred in heaven, saying: "The kingdom of the world did become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he will rule as king forever and ever."

16 And the twenty-four elders who were seated before God upon their thrones fell upon their faces and worshiped God, 17 saying: "We thank you, Jehovah God, the Almighty, the One who is and who was, because you have taken your great power and begun ruling as king. 18 But the nations became wrathful, and your own wrath came, and the appointed time for the dead to be judged, and to give [their]reward to your slaves the prophets and to the holy ones and to those fearing your name, the small and the great, and to bring to ruin those ruining the earth."

19 And the temple [sanctuary] of God that is in heaven was opened, and the ark of his covenant was seen in his temple [sanctuary]. And there occurred lightnings and voices and thunders and an earthquake and a great hail.[/b]

Is this the third woe?

If you continue reading on in chapter 12 it seems to me that the third woe may be when Satan is cast.

Again, I do not have the Climax book handy to see exactly what the Society says about this.


Regards,

Shibboleth

Shibboleth
01-12-2007, 07:51 PM
Hi Shibboleth,
Interestingly this topic has also been addressed by Robert in his latest mail blog, and contrary to what has been written appears to be at variance with his view, which interestingly concurs with the Watchtower. I have posted a response to that blog based on your research, so it will be interesting to see what his take is on this. For me it appears to harmonise the prophesies of Joel with Revelation in a more satifactory manner, but let&#39;s see what he has to say!

EF[/b]

Great! I will check it out.

edited in : Checked it out. It seems odd that he comes to that conclusion especially after saying that in the bible locust armies represented invading enemies. After seeing the reference to Joel it solidifies in me more that the locust army of Revelation are "enemy hordes". Also look at the picture in teh Climax book. They look alot like something that would come from a Babo/Assyrian army. weird.

Eli&#39;s Foe
01-12-2007, 08:39 PM
<div class='quotemain'>Hi Shibboleth,
Interestingly this topic has also been addressed by Robert in his latest mail blog, and contrary to what has been written appears to be at variance with his view, which interestingly concurs with the Watchtower. I have posted a response to that blog based on your research, so it will be interesting to see what his take is on this. For me it appears to harmonise the prophesies of Joel with Revelation in a more satifactory manner, but let&#39;s see what he has to say!

EF[/b]

Great! I will check it out.

edited in : Checked it out. It seems odd that he comes to that conclusion especially after saying that in the bible locust armies represented invading enemies. After seeing the reference to Joel it solidifies in me more that the locust army of Revelation are "enemy hordes". Also look at the picture in teh Climax book. They look alot like something that would come from a Babo/Assyrian army. weird.
[/b][/quote]

Looking at this again, I now see that the woes follow the opening of the seventh seal. Bearing in mind that the first six seals lead up to and cover the Great Tribulation and the three woes follow the opening of the seventh seal after the final sealing of the annointed, Satan has already fallen, hence there must be another interpretation. In fact the annointed in the final phase will indeed underatake the final witness to all the nations prior to Armageddon so perhaps the interpretation by Robert and the Watchtower is indeed correct.

Shibboleth
01-12-2007, 08:55 PM
<div class='quotemain'><div class='quotemain'>Hi Shibboleth,
Interestingly this topic has also been addressed by Robert in his latest mail blog, and contrary to what has been written appears to be at variance with his view, which interestingly concurs with the Watchtower. I have posted a response to that blog based on your research, so it will be interesting to see what his take is on this. For me it appears to harmonise the prophesies of Joel with Revelation in a more satifactory manner, but let&#39;s see what he has to say!

EF[/b]

Great! I will check it out.

edited in : Checked it out. It seems odd that he comes to that conclusion especially after saying that in the bible locust armies represented invading enemies. After seeing the reference to Joel it solidifies in me more that the locust army of Revelation are "enemy hordes". Also look at the picture in teh Climax book. They look alot like something that would come from a Babo/Assyrian army. weird.
[/b][/quote]

Looking at this again, I now see that the woes follow the opening of the seventh seal. Bearing in mind that the first six seals lead up to and cover the Great Tribulation and the three woes follow the opening of the seventh seal after the final sealing of the annointed, Satan has already fallen, hence there must be another interpretation. In fact the annointed in the final phase will indeed underatake the final witness to all the nations prior to Armageddon so perhaps the interpretation by Robert and the Watchtower is indeed correct.
[/b][/quote]

I think the seals, trumpets and bowls are linked together. They happen simultaneously. first seal/first trumpet/first bowl. John just sees them happening at intervals (all the seals then all the trumpets etc). I think they are all connected.

watchman
01-13-2007, 08:18 AM
It seems to me that the title of Destroyer is an appropriate name for Christ during the judgment. After all, Satan is not going to destroy his world. Jesus is. Keep in mind that Jesus is depicted as a warrior throughout the book of Revelation. For example, he is described as having a long sword protruding from his mouth, with which he is to war against those carrying on evil in his congregation. He is also portrayed as a horseman with both a bow and a sword. Not to be over-looked is the fact that in the letters to the congregations Jesus highlights the role of the role the victorious anointed will play in dashing the nations with an iron rod.

The most convincing proof that the locust are the anointed and that Christ is Abaddon is the fact that the locusts are said to cause men torment. In the 11th chapter of Revelation the two witnesses are also said to cause the nations to be tormented by their prophesying.

The unfortunate aspect of the Watchtower&#39;s interpretation is that they have identified the locusts as the anointed since 1919. In reality, the judgment is to come. And along with the judgment comes the revealing of the sons of God. Along with the revealing of the sons of God Christ will transform them into a ferocious band of warriors who will plague the world by announcing Jehovah&#39;s immutable judgments. The stinging takes place over the course of five months to illustrate the relatively short lifespan of the locusts; that&#39;s in view of the fact that all of the sons of God on earth at that time will be killed because of their witnessing. (Seems to me the WT once brought out that a locust lives about 5 months)

Watchman

Jeshurun
01-13-2007, 12:30 PM
The stinging takes place over the course of five months to illustrate the relatively short lifespan of the locusts; that&#39;s in view of the fact that all of the sons of God on earth at that time will be killed because of their witnessing. (Seems to me the WT once brought out that a locust lives about 5 months)

Watchman[/b]

I remember very clearly that the WT explained that since five months was the lifespan of a locust, it signified that they would sting the men their whole lives for however long they lived. How much clearer it all is when encapsulated inside the 42 months.

Shibboleth
01-15-2007, 01:21 PM
Watchman, Just a few questions for ya.

How do you explain then that the locust army was not to harm those with the seal of God on their foreheads? If the locust army represented the annointed class, why would Jehovah explicitly instruct them not to hurt themselves? It does not make sense. Also why is it only Jehovah&#39;s Witnesses that believe that the locust army is the annointed and Christ is Apollyon when everyone else in the world, especially some reknowned scholars who are unbiased, believe it is something different?(I know that the GB is very privileged to have insight but why such a dramatic interpertation?) Since most Witnesses have an earthly hope, we are not the ones with the seal of God in our foreheads, so why would the preaching message hurt us? Why would it torment us? When I think of abyss, I think of prison, or darkness. How come when the abyss is mentioned all through Revelation it means a dark spirtual state or prison and is always denoted for governments/Satan to be cast into it or like in the case of the wild beast it comes out of the abyss? Just because Christ can be likened to a Destroyer it doesn&#39;t mean he is Apollyon/Abaddon. Satan can also be a Destroyer. In fact that is what Satan is best at. He has destroyed the human family by tempting them into sin. He has destroyed many many people in the wars that man fights amongst themselves. He has also destroyed the earth using man. And he has also destroyed people&#39;s faith and turned it against Jehovah.

When I asked one of my friends about this, they didn&#39;t give me any viable answers on what they thought, they just opened the Rev Book and copied it verbatim. In their description it brought out all the dates I have trouble with (all the ones where the trumpet-like blasts are heard at conventions).

What I am looking for is logical answers without an explanation using some dates from conventions.

Regards,

Shibboleth