Robert needs to add a crazy emoji in the like category.Scientists create vaccine for coronaviruses that are undiscovered
The new approach to vaccines called 'proactive vaccinology', from the universities of Oxford, Cambridge and Caltech in California , builds a vaccine before the disease even becomes threat.www.dailymail.co.uk
I've looked for one. There is no optionRobert needs to add a crazy emoji in the like category.
You know what is irritating about some of these articles? They now use the word “jab“ for vaccines! Wasn’t that originally a derogatory term for vaccine? Now they interchange it with the word vaccine as if the word jab is just an alternate word for vaccine. So now, when someone is speaking about the jab, people don’t know if you are for or against them.Scientists create vaccine for coronaviruses that are undiscovered
The new approach to vaccines called 'proactive vaccinology', from the universities of Oxford, Cambridge and Caltech in California , builds a vaccine before the disease even becomes threat.
Also, "jab" sounds a lot less dangerous. I've always called them injections, much more descriptiveYou know what is irritating about some of these articles? They now use the word “jab“ for vaccines! Wasn’t that originally a derogatory term for vaccine? Now they interchange it with the word vaccine as if the word jab is just an alternate word for vaccine. So now, when someone is speaking about the jab, people don’t know if you are for or against them.
Clot shot gets the point across tooAlso, "jab" sounds a lot less dangerous. I've always called them injections, much more descriptive
You know what is irritating about some of these articles? They now use the word “jab“ for vaccines! Wasn’t that originally a derogatory term for vaccine? Now they interchange it with the word vaccine as if the word jab is just an alternate word for vaccine. So now, when someone is speaking about the jab, people don’t know if you are for or against them.
It sure does!
Stroke poke?
That too.. too many to relay..